rspamd: upgrade to rspamd 3.9.1 #5661
Conversation
DerLinkman
changed the title
DerLinkman
force-pushed
the
feat/rspamd-3.8
branch
3 times, most recently
from
ad0f0f2
to
a9a04b2
Compare
|
Better wait for 3.9.0 or 3.8.5 In 3.8.x there was issues with bayes that not yet in any release. |
DerLinkman
force-pushed
the
feat/rspamd-3.8
branch
from
a9a04b2
to
1166af5
Compare
DerLinkman
changed the title
DerLinkman
force-pushed
the
feat/rspamd-3.8
branch
from
7bfd38d
to
bc07f51
Compare
DerLinkman
changed the title
DerLinkman
force-pushed
the
feat/rspamd-3.8
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e4fce3a
to
ecf1782
Compare
DerLinkman
force-pushed
the
feat/rspamd-3.8
branch
from
ecf1782
to
d4e7a7d
Compare
DerLinkman
force-pushed
the
feat/rspamd-3.8
branch
from
d4e7a7d
to
6e00d65
Compare
Would it also make sense to add ABUSIX like SpamHaus? |
@flo-m . Abusix isn't free at all (5k queries), no, it not makes sense, and yes, nobody blocking you from modifying rspamd configuration. Even when you will leave only their ip, domain and url blacklist - one email in avg will eat 10-20 dns reauests to this rbl, 5000/20=250 emails per day, this really not covers anything... 10,000rq/d is already 10$. JFYI - Their docs example provide many things that not all needed in rspamd, some of them better just be skipped. About scores - will just say - score need be dropped in 3-4 times compared to what they wrote. |
This PR updates
the Debian within the container to Debian 12(freeze, needs more testing) and Updates Rspamd to Version 3.8.Patchnotes for Rspamd 3.8: https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/releases/tag/3.8.0Patchnotes for Rspamd 3.8.4: https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/releases/tag/3.8.4Patchnotes for Rspamd 3.9.1: https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/releases/tag/3.9.1